DockLine https://www.covesdockline.com Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:25:30 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://www.covesdockline.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/cropped-Dockline-Navy-Badge-32x32.png DockLine https://www.covesdockline.com 32 32 November 12, 2025 Board Meeting https://www.covesdockline.com/november-12-2025-board-meeting/ Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:12:35 +0000 https://www.covesdockline.com/?p=1037 AI generated highlights with timestamps to accompany original meeting audio file

0:00–5:30 | Call to Order and Initial Business
The meeting opened with informal conversation before the chair called it to order and verified that notice had been properly provided. A quorum of five directors was confirmed. Owner’s Forum opened without comments. The agenda was adjusted slightly to move the Garden Committee report earlier. The revised agenda was approved smoothly.

5:30–9:05 | Approval of Minutes and Manager’s Report
The board approved the September meeting minutes and the organizational minutes from October. The owner annual meeting minutes were noted as informational and not subject to approval. The manager’s report included routine updates on property transfers, disclosure packages, and welcome materials. There were no concerns or questions, and the tone remained procedural.

9:05–13:05 | Mariners Point, Villas, and President’s Report
Mariners Point reported a new board, winterization efforts, and a tree that had fallen across the kayak path. The Villas had no major updates after officer elections. The president reported receipt of settlement funds and a legal reimbursement, both deposited into reserves. A short-term rental covenant amendment effort did not reach quorum and was formally closed for the year, though signatures will be retained. This portion was informational and non-controversial.

13:05–17:12 | Treasurer’s Report
The treasurer, attending via Zoom, explained that a callable CD had redeemed, temporarily increasing available cash to roughly $151,000. The board discussed how much liquidity should be retained for possible water or HVAC failures. The reserve study suggested maintaining at least sixty-five thousand in accessible funds. Members balanced preserving liquidity with seeking appropriate yields. All officer and management reports were approved with little discussion.

17:12–23:17 | Landscaping Committee Charter and Name Change
The Garden Committee presented a request to adopt a new charter and rename itself the Landscaping Committee. The chair described the committee’s purpose as advisory, focusing on cohesive appearance standards, sustainable plantings, contractor research, and long-term improvement planning. The committee emphasized that it would not direct contractors or assume operational control.

Concerns emerged regarding language that allowed the chair to select additional advisors “at their discretion,” which some directors interpreted as granting excessive gatekeeping authority. The committee agreed to revise the language. Further discussion focused on funding limitations; several directors stressed that the HOA relies on a tight budget and that recommendations would need to be realistic. The committee clarified that its work would be scalable and sensitive to financial constraints.

A significant portion of the discussion centered on the boundaries between the Landscaping Committee and Building & Grounds. Some directors worried that the committee’s evaluative role could be perceived as checking or second-guessing maintenance operations. Committee members restated multiple times that their function was advisory only and agreed to remove any wording that implied oversight. Additional points were raised regarding unauthorized materials and decorations in common areas, prompting broader agreement that natural landscaping materials should be encouraged.

With the clarifications in place, the board approved both the name change and the charter, with one abstention from a director who had not had time to review the full document.

23:17–26:00 | ACC Report
The ACC reported approval of a homeowner request for a pathway, patio, and planting beds. The approval included the standard conditions outlined in the application. This section proceeded quickly without disagreement.

26:00–35:15 | Building & Grounds Report
The Building & Grounds report focused on extensive pool deck repairs, including a structural ledger beam issue that had required jacking and reconstruction. Additional work on the deck band was also underway to prevent debris buildup. The report also covered experimental repairs to the tennis courts using elastomeric material to fill cracks before winter. Early results were promising, and the board expressed appreciation that these repairs might delay larger capital expenses. No substantial conflict arose during this segment.

35:15–42:00 | Water and Sewer System Update
The chair described winterization of the water tank and coordination for septic inspection with Mariners Point to avoid duplicate billing. There was consideration of hiring technical support for the water system, though concerns about cost were noted. A discrepancy between pumped water volume and billed usage suggested at least one home meter was failing. Because many meters predate 2018, a replacement plan may be required. The discussion conveyed guarded concern about aging water-system infrastructure but remained constructive.

42:00–47:30 | Septic Enforcement and Owner Education
A proposed enforcement procedure for overdue septic pump-outs led to substantive debate. The policy established a sequence of notice, reminders, certified letters, and fines, citing the importance of maintaining a healthy drain field. One director expressed discomfort with punitive measures and preferred education only; others argued that without consequences, the shared system remains vulnerable. The board passed the enforcement policy with one dissenting vote. A related recommendation to require overdue condo tanks to be pumped was accepted without contention. This transitioned into a short discussion about owner misunderstandings of septic use and the need for clearer education.

47:30–63:00 | Kayak Storage, Unclaimed Boats, and Timeline for Policy Changes
The board revisited ongoing issues with kayak storage. Several unclaimed boats had initially been slated for donation, but new information prompted a temporary pause. A broader concern surfaced around fairness, as some residents had difficulty obtaining spots while others stored multiple boats. Members also noted that addressing the issue during the holiday and winter season would be impractical. After discussing logistics and ownership verification challenges, the board agreed to adopt a modified kayak-storage system beginning in 2027 to allow adequate time for communication and adjustment.

63:00–72:45 | Playground Concept Discussion
A director presented early ideas for a community playground, including considerations for equipment, safety, location, liability, and accessibility. He mentioned willingness to contribute personal funds and suggested community fundraising. The discussion was exploratory and positive, without opposition or formal decisions.

72:45–End | Final Remarks and Adjournment
The meeting moved toward conclusion without additional major topics. Remaining comments were administrative in nature. While some segments earlier in the meeting involved tension—especially around landscaping authority, septic enforcement, and kayak storage—the board ultimately made clear decisions in each area. The meeting closed with an understanding that several topics, including playground planning and water-system monitoring, would continue to evolve over the coming year.

DockLine Discussions › New Landscaping Committee and Charter
  • Author
    Posts
    • #1036
      Carolyn Schott

      Congratulations to the members of the Landscape Committee, formally call the Gardens Committee , for the approval of their new name and charter.  These members: Jason Foster, Linda Gray, Henly Deutsch, Mark Deutsch, Stan Murphy, and Carolyn Schott have been diligently working for a year to bring this committee and its charter into fruition.  The Landscape Committee will be advising the Board of Directors on matters relating to the appearance, design, and aesthetic standards of the community’s common areas.  The Committee’s mission is to promote a cohesive, attractive, and well-maintained environment that supports property values and reflects the natural coastal beauty of The Coves at Wilton Creek.  The Coves natural setting defines its identity.  The following standards, by which the committee will be guided, will preserve and enhance the beauty that we love, through a cohesive “coastal casual” landscape character —– relaxed, natural, and timeless:

      • Harmony with the environment:  use plantings and materials that thrive locally.
      • Low-maintenance resilience: favor self-sustaining, drought-tolerant species.
      • Cohesive design: group plantings and consistent materials for a unified look.
      • Respect for shared areas: keep all common spaces safe, tidy, and attractive.

      If you would like to participate in this exciting endeavor or have questions, please contact:  Carolyn Schott (cjschott@verizon.net) Jason Foster (JFoster1441@gmail.com), Mark Deutsch (mark@markdeutsch.com), Henly Deutsch (henlydeutsch@gmail.com), Stan Murphy (estanleymurphy@gmail.com), Linda Gray (mslggray@gmail.com).

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
]]>
2025 Annual Meeting Recap – October 18, 2025 https://www.covesdockline.com/2026-annual-meeting-recap-october-18-2025/ Sun, 19 Oct 2025 15:17:16 +0000 https://www.covesdockline.com/?p=1021 Time-stamped guide for the meeting recording

00:00:00–00:02:30 | Pre-start & Seating

  • Casual chatter; chair shortage and extra chairs offered.
  • Organizer cues a “good turnout” and prepares to begin.

00:02:53–00:06:00 | Call to Order & Quorum

  • Presiding: President Katy Breuer introduces board: Denny Waldrop, Lynn Finkel, Don Pax, Carolyn Schott, Joyce Livingstone; notes Joey Caisse absent (business trip). CBM reps: Ashleigh Palmer (mgr), Liz Tomin (check-in).
  • Quorum: 41 proxies/absentee ballots recorded → quorum met.
  • Notice: Mailed Sep 15, 2025 (33 days prior); email Sep 26; mailed package Sep 29.

00:06:00–00:06:56 | Minutes

  • Motion to waive reading and approve 2024 annual minutesApproved (voice vote).

00:06:20–00:13:14 | President’s Report (Highlights)

  • HRSD “certificate of take” (forced main under entrance): retained counsel Steve Clark (Waldo & Lyle); HRSD relinquished certificate. Outcome: Association receives $1,900 + HRSD pays legal fees; attorney also contributed $1,500 toward HOA prior costs → $3,400 total, no land given.
  • Ongoing items: realtor/owner inquiries (water/septic, docs, ACC, docks, clubhouse, storage); storage lot billing cleanup; missing trailer resolved (wrong trailer taken); vendor comms, delinquency follow-up; 2025 reserve study by Giles & Flythe (as heard “Guilds in Flight”); security system midnight–6am access list maintained; bank signatories; holiday entrance decor coordination; short-term rental forms available up front.

00:13:14–00:18:56 | Financials & 2026 Budget

  • Reserves (Sep): $583,000; Operating cash: $2,100.
  • YTD revenue/expense: $140k / $132k → ~$8k surplus (timing effects); $4.4k better than plan.
  • 2026 Assessment: $800/yr (+10%).
  • Water rate: $132/quarter for first 12k gal (+10%), driven by inflation and PFAS testing required in 2026.
  • Contract assumptions: landscaping +3%; Sidner water maintenance +5%; switch from Wind River to Virginia Septic (estimate TBD, budgeted +5%); interest income conservatively reduced.
  • Reserve contribution in budget: $4,400 (consultant recommended $25k; board capped to avoid higher dues).
  • Anticipated reserve projects: second pump replacement (first replaced May 2024), clubhouse HVAC near end-of-life, tennis court repairs (not full replacement).

00:18:56–00:19:59 | Committee Reports – ACC (brief)

  • 1 house paint request; 3 tree/shrub removal; 1 landscaping plan.
  • Use CBM site form; submit to Mary Galloway (chair).

00:19:59–00:26:30 | Building & Grounds (Bob Livingstone)

  • Soft-wash clubhouse roof/siding/decks; stain applied (should last >1 year).
  • Deck repairs; cedar siding sections pre-stained and installed.
  • Ramp road asphalt section (≈16’×18’) excavated/re-bedded/re-paved (root damage).
  • Entrance fence soft-washed; mulch done community-wide (new contractor after GLF change).
  • Multiple competitive bids pursued; HVAC annual maintenance; new cleaning contractor praised.
  • Tree canopy thinning near pool and view corridors to creek; ongoing every 4–5 years.
  • Weatherproof display boards built for notices/art.

00:26:30–00:38:36 | Water & Sewer (Katy; chair)

  • Annual withdrawal limit: 3.6M gal; 2024 usage: ~2.9M gal (incl. homes, condos, docks, weekly line flush).
  • Leaks: 6 total (5 homeowner + Villas building 5), all Nov 2024–Mar 2025; detection via pump runtime and meter checks.
  • Late Aug incident: Air compressor stuck on → air in lines, “no water” reports; extensive system flushing performed; community urged to report issues (even duplicates).
  • Capital/ops: Installed pressure-switch alternator (pump duty alternation); complete Well #3 rehab (returned to service after clearing green tint); Well 2 NX flow too low (1.5–2 gpm) → not pursued; weekly chlorine checks; ongoing Clarity/clarifier use (clarifies sediment).
  • Regulatory: Annual water report (May/Jun); DEQ tank inspection done (every 3 yrs); begin permit renewal process for 2028 (3.6M gal).
  • Septic: Home tanks pumped/inspected every 5 yrs; condos inspected annually; sand bed liner/pump/electrical repaired; switch to Virginia Septic; storm-damaged sand bed fence repaired (Q1 2025).
  • Power outages: Limit water use; prolonged outage may trigger boil advisory community-wide.

00:38:36–00:39:42 | Aquifer Question

  • Member asks about aquifer status; response: regulators monitor overall use; no specific status update available.

00:39:42–00:41:25 | 40th Anniversary Note

  • Community 40-year anniversary; cake/social planned post-business.

00:40:53–00:46:39 | Nominating & Candidate Intros

  • Carolyn Schott & Lynn Finkel (committee) introduce candidates:
    • Katy Breuer (incumbent President).
    • Mark Deutsch (statement read—30+ yrs exec leadership; transparency, fiscal discipline, recordings, surveys, scorecards).
    • Jason Foster (remarks: DockLine transparency site launched; ~1/3 of members registered; documents centralized; forums for comments).
    • Joyce Livingstone (incumbent Treasurer): overview of CBM role and Fidelity vs bank CDs; plan to ladder CDs; money market yields likely to decline if Fed cuts; low-risk focus; invites homeowner input.

00:52:32–00:55:26 | Voting Instructions

  • Elect 2 directors (3-year terms). Ballots also issued for each proxy held. Vote for ≤2 or ballot is void.
  • IRS “excess income to reserves” resolution on ballot (board recommends YES to avoid taxation on HOA excess).

00:55:26–00:59:59 | Ballot Collection & Small Announcements

  • Volunteers recruited to count with Ashley inside.
  • Pump-out station at Mariners Point docks closing early November (boats only).

00:58:34–01:01:12 | Short-Term Rental (STR) Bylaw Update

  • Yes/No form now used (earlier lacked “No” option).
  • Counting signatures through end of October; needs 2/3 of owners community-wide.
  • Condos already have rules (Villas: ≥12-month lease; Mariners Point: ≤15% leased, ≥6 months min), but condo owners still vote as HOA members.

01:01:12–01:14:18 | Homeowners Forum (2-min limit)

  • Pump-out schedule notifications: Water & Sewer will notify owners when due (close to month).
  • Public Water conversion: Significant cost/unknowns (creek crossing). Recommended to table; any next step would start with engineering study (who pays undetermined). Broad owner input intended; 2/3 thresholds referenced in discussion.
  • Gardening/landscaping costs: Question about adding paid vendor vs volunteers amid reserve constraints; committee clarifies scope still under study; not a proposal for immediate spend.
  • Several owners thank the board; notes on fiscal prudence and meeting participation.

01:14:12–end | Social & Wrap

  • Cake service begins while votes are counted; light conversation; no final election results announced on-mic within this clip.

Admin edit: Final results not heard in audio, Katy Breuer and Joyce Livingstone Re-Elected

DockLine Discussions › Annual Meeting Recap & Open Thread
  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 6 months ago by Admin Admin.
  • Author
    Posts
    • #1024
      Admin Admin

      Miss something live or want to add your takeaways? Drop your notes, questions, or corrections here. Please keep it neighborly—cite timestamps if you’re referencing a specific moment from the recording, and focus on association business (budget, reserves, STR amendment, water & sewer, committee work, election process).

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
]]>
September HOA Board Meeting – September 17, 2025 https://www.covesdockline.com/september-hoa-board-meeting-september-17-2025/ Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:12:31 +0000 https://www.covesdockline.com/?p=645 Detailed Transcript with Tone & Conflicts

Time stamped to accompany original audio recording

0:40 – 4:10 | Agenda Adjustments
The chair moved to adjust the agenda:
• Add lien notices under new business.
• Move “tall grass complaint” to executive session because it involves covenants.
• Include a garden committee item under new business.
There was some hesitation: “Should the grass complaint really be behind closed doors?” one asked. Another insisted covenants required privacy.
Conflict: Small but pointed disagreement over transparency vs. confidentiality.
Motion: Amended agenda approved.

4:10 – 9:10 | Minutes & Treasurer’s Motion
• July and August minutes approved without objection.
• Treasurer’s report: Motion to move matured CDs into Fidelity laddered investments.
◦ Question raised: “Does Fidelity charge for advising?”
◦ Answer: “No.”
• Motion passed unanimously.
Tone: Procedural, smooth.

9:10 – 22:10 | Building & Grounds & Pool Repairs
The Building & Grounds lead detailed projects:
• Pool deck repairs underway, pre-treated and stained.
• Contractors reluctant to take on future pool plastering jobs.
• Mention of switching to a newer, two-part epoxy-like coating.
Conflict arose over mowing:
• One member complained the fields looked neglected: “It just doesn’t seem to have worked out very well this summer.”
• Grounds lead defended GLF: “Their tractor was down, so they cut 25 acres with zero-turns. That was a diligent effort.”
Tone: Defensive from grounds lead, critical from members.

22:10 – 36:10 | Grounds Motions – Lights and Kayaks
Solar Lights by Pond
• Bob Livingston proposed five solar accent lights: “I thought they would look nice on the pond.”
• Pushback: “There’s no precedent. This will cause more complaints.”
• Another member tied it to a larger issue, citing unauthorized changes: zinnias planted, asphalt chunks for edging, and “eggs with Bible verses and campaign slogans left around the property.”
• Tension grew as the conversation veered from lights to accusations of improper decorations.
Vote: Motion failed after sharp division.
Tone: Heated, accusatory.
Unclaimed Kayaks
• Two abandoned kayaks sparked debate: sell, donate, or auction?
• Betty Waldrop suggested donating to a school or fire station. Others agreed.
• Amended motion: donate kayaks, with option for community buyer via fire station.
• Passed unanimously.
Tone: Collaborative, practical.

36:10 – 48:10 | Garden Committee Renaming Debate
Proposal: rename “Garden Committee” → “Landscaping Committee.”
• Proponents: “Garden sounds like vegetables and flowers. Landscaping better reflects the work.”
• Opponents: “This committee hasn’t presented a plan in a year. Why rename something that hasn’t delivered?”
• Heated exchange: one member accused Carolyn Schott of pushing change for appearances. Carolyn replied defensively, insisting the work was ongoing but long-term.
• Another supporter interjected: “I asked her to raise this. Don’t pile on her.”
Resolution: Postpone until a formal charter is produced.
Conflict: Strong. Opponents skeptical of purpose and funding; supporters frustrated by lack of recognition.


Tone: Defensive, tense, edging on hostile.

48:10 – 56:10 | Water & Sewer Updates
• Chlorine injector failing; replacement likely needed but not dangerous.
• Annual septic maintenance completed by Virginia Septic, praised for thoroughness.
• PFAS testing required in 2026, expected cost $1,200.
Tone: Neutral, technical. Mild concern about future costs.

56:10 – 68:10 | Short-Term Rental Restriction
• Proposal to restrict to six months minimum.
• 73 signatures collected, but no quorum.
• Motion: send one last solicitation with October 31 deadline, adding “No” checkbox.
Conflict: A member insisted “no response means no,” but others argued silence shouldn’t count.
Motion passed.
Tone: Procedural, mildly contentious.

68:10 – 78:10 | Middlesex Water Authority
• Presentation of costs and financing for possible public water connection.
• Board emphasized it was only information at this stage.
• Motion: include materials in annual packet.
Conflict: One member argued reserves weren’t fully considered. Treasurer clarified.
Tone: Neutral but cautious, wary of cost escalation.

78:10 – 87:10 | Reserve Study & Budget
• Debate on approving vs. acknowledging the study.
• Decision: approve executive summary, share in owner packet.
• 2026 budget approved with 10% dues increase.
Conflict: Member conditioned approval on reviewing long-standing vendor contracts.
Tone: Serious but professional.

87:10 – 94:10 | Election Integrity & Website Dispute
Complaint: Unofficial sites CovesatWiltonCreek.com and Paradise in Hartfield Va Facebook group not managed by the HOA and use community’s name, confusing owners with conflict of interest in board election.
• Legal opinion: Board cannot control domains without trademarking.
• Motion: HOA will publicly disclaim affiliation. Passed.
Conflict: Heated dispute when an incumbent board member was accused of conflict of interest in the discussion. Another member insisted she step aside.


Tone: Defensive, personal, contentious.

94:10 – 100:10 | Eggshell Decorations
Complaint about decorated eggshells scattered in common areas.
• One member: “They’re trash. Asphalt chunks and twigs have also been used as edging.”
• Carolyn admitted she had already been removing them quietly.
• Board: “We don’t expect you to do it—this is a covenant violation.”
• Motion: declare eggshells a violation, ask violator to cease, GLF to clean up. Passed 5–1.
Tone: Petty but oddly serious; frustration about recurring unauthorized decorations.

100:10 – 103:10 | Campaign Signs & Materials
• No explicit rules against campaign signs, flyers, or door-to-door.
• Several members disliked the idea but admitted it cannot be prohibited.


Tone: Reluctant acceptance.

103:10 – 109:10 | Late Fee Notices
Complaint: Letters felt threatening, especially lien warnings after only 10 days.
• One member: “This sounds like a collection agency. It’s too harsh.”
• Others: “It’s legal transparency. Judges will side against us if we soften it.”
• Motion: keep current language. Passed.
Conflict: Philosophical split over tone vs. legal duty.
Tone: Divided but resolved firmly.

109:10 – 112:10 | Owner’s Forum
A resident raised election fairness concerns from 2022:
• Claimed one candidate used CBM’s official email list to promote herself.
• Other candidates were not given the same opportunity.
• Resident asked: “If this happens again, what will the board do about it?”
The chair reminded that the forum was for listening, not debate, but the concern was noted.
Tone: Distrustful, skeptical of board fairness.

Key Conflicts Recap
• Solar lights & unauthorized decorations: Symbolic clash over aesthetics and covenant enforcement.
• Garden vs. Landscaping committee: Power struggle over recognition and control.
• Election websites & candidate fairness: Deep suspicion, bordering on personal attacks.
• Late fee notices: Tone vs. legal protection split the board.

DockLine Discussions › September Bi-Monthly Board Meeting Discussion
  • This topic has 10 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 6 months ago by Admin Admin.
  • Author
    Posts
    • #646
      Admin Admin

      Hi Neighbors, starting this topic for discussion of the board meeting that took place September 17, 2025. AI generated highlights and original audio clip are available on the Board Meeting Recaps post. This forum will also be embedded on the post.

    • #773
      Megan Doody

      Hi Everyone!
      I think first and foremost there needs to be a SECURE way to collect votes. Thoughts?

    • #805
      Jason Foster

      Hey Megan, I think we already pay Chesapeake Bay Management for electronic voting but have never used it. By law and our covenants we could adopt a secure system at any time. I’ll see if I can dig out their contract from the CBM drive and add it to the database.

      From Wilton:

      Virginia state law expressly permits the use of electronic voting for homeowners associations, including elections and rule approvals, with specific safeguards for secret ballots. According to Virginia Code § 55.1-1832, unless the declaration prohibits it, votes, consents, or approvals required under the declaration, bylaws, or state law may be obtained electronically. The law mandates that a record of the electronic vote be created and maintained similarly to a traditional paper record.

      If a vote is required by secret ballot, the electronic voting method must protect the identity of the voter. If it cannot guarantee voter anonymity, then an alternative voting method must be used.

      Furthermore, the association’s board of directors must adopt guidelines governing electronic meetings and electronic voting to ensure authorized participation, transparency, and security. Those who cannot or prefer not to use electronic means must be provided with a reasonable alternative at the association’s expense.

      These provisions align with The Coves at Wilton Creek’s governance practices and ensure compliance with Virginia statutory requirements.

      For more details, you may review Virginia Code § 55.1-1832 here: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title55.1/chapter18/section55.1-1832/ and The Coves’ governing documents at https://www.covesdockline.com/covenants-restrictions/ and https://www.covesdockline.com/bylaws/.

      • #812
        Megan Doody

        Thank you! 🙂

         

    • #1000
      Megan Doody

      It is very concerning to me that the information being brought forth to our community by our board of directors is not transparent. Further, it seems that several feel they can lie on behalf of our community for their own interest. We need a board that will be transparent to us.

    • #1001
      Jason Foster

      This is a huge issue and a major reason I no longer trust the process under this Board.

      At the July 2025 meeting, the Gardening Committee planned to present a resident survey that had been previewed to the Board for input. Instead of offering feedback, the President and Vice President rewrote the survey on their own, altering both its content and intent. When the committee’s representative refused to present a version they had not created, the Board allowed the official minutes to record that the member “declined to present” the survey — without explaining why.

      That revision erased the truth: the committee didn’t back out; they refused to present something misrepresented as their work.
      Then, at the September meeting, the director supporting this committee was subjected to open hostility — talked over, mocked, and scolded — simply for suggesting the committee be renamed to better reflect its role. The behavior of certain directors during that exchange was unprofessional and discouraging to anyone who wants to participate constructively in this community.

    • #1011
      Mark Deutsch

      This is an excellent step toward greater transparency for our association, which I believe is of paramount importance for any HOA. I appreciate your comments Megan (and Jason) and agree that we should pursue secure electronic voting as an option. The easier we make the process for our fellow residents to participate, the better. Thanks.

    • #1015
      Carolyn Schott

      Thank you to all the comments posted on this discussion.  I fully support having secure electronic voting and I will bring this up at one of the first couple of meetings in the next board year unless Mark or Jason want to do so.  I am looking forward to working with both of them on the board and bringing about changes toward a community without controversy and one that becomes fully educated in the spirit and words of the documents.  I am looking forward to working with board members who support following the documents.

    • #1016
      Megan Doody

      I am concerned regarding the  email that was sent out to the community in what seems like a rebuttal toward Stan Murphys acquired information through FOIA. The information that was recorded during the association meeting is entirely different than that of what was being communicated to the county by our association president. Further, I found the email sent to be  very unprofessional in stating they are “setting the record straight.” In addition, I would also like to state that a board members name was left off of the email that was sent to the community. Am I correct in stating that this was likely done intentionally? Disgraceful. I was also advised recently that the president changes the minutes after the meetings and withholds the association secretary from doing her job.

    • #1030
      Carolyn Schott

      Megan, You are correct in thinking my name was left off the letter written by Katy, intentionally.  But that is okay because I would not have condoned that letter.  And, yes, every set of meeting minutes that I have submitted for review  to the board before the meeting during which they were to be approved were heavily re-written during the last 2 years by the president because she thought her version was better.  You are also correct regarding my job.  The documents state that the secretary should keep an accurate record of all members and their contact info.  I have been denied access to that information and performing that duty by Katy and CBM.  The documents also state that the secretary is responsible for process of the annual meeting, security of  proxies and the election process as a whole.   I did this when I was secretary about 10 years ago.  Katy  also refused to allow me the right to performing this duty. CBM did everything. Hopefully, we will have electronic voting by next year’s meeting.

      Also of note, I had an emergency that took me home yesterday during the breakdown process after the meeting and returned within 10 minutes to find that “We held a short meeting.  I am president, Joey is Vice-President, Joyce is treasurer, Lynn is secretary.”  I was not told when or where this meeting would take place even though I am still on the board.

       

       

    • #1031
      James Knupp

      May I ask a question?  Having been involved in the board election processes a few times, I recall the vote by the board to determine the officers for the coming year normally happens closely after the vote as to who is on the board. Members and Previous members of the board are aware of this normality. It would be unusual for a board member to miss this event, especially if there was no notice to the others that there should be a delay.

      I understand  there was concern that Carolyn was not present when the votes occurred this year. but in the end it made her presence made no difference. The votes were unanimous for those elected.

       

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
]]>